The kind of research that you do as a scientist and the kinds of conclusions you come to are greatly influenced by the basic assumptions you make about the causes of evolution. Basic assumptions made by different disciplines or theoretical persuasions are called research strategies or paradigms. Emic and Etic conclusions can come to different conclusions. Emic perspectives refers to internal elements of the research and their functioning rather than in terms of the external framework. For example what results would occur from covid on the internal workings of the brain if the cells are invaded by a spike protein in the frontal Temporal Area of the brain or Area 4 of the brain? If it evolves into a new variant with a new spike protein, after 3 months, and you cannot have a vaccine for 1 year, that will be effective. And what are the results of cells in the white and grey matter of the brain in the different aphasia’s, or inner workings of the cells being attacked in the Ace 2 or in the inner workings of the Ace 2 cells in the supplementary muscle area, as area 4 or the Temporal area, which is the inner working, and not researched as an external framework of vaccines for example. If you cannot make vaccines fast enough, and research their results, before application to a homo sapien arm on the exterior, then you cannot tell us the Emic workings of what happens to the organs that the brain responds to like muscles, kidneys, heart etc.
The etic conclusion of a researcher is influenced by first the discipline you have as a researcher, and it’s approach realizes that the members of a culture often are too involved with what they are doing to interpret results without prejudice of discipline they study and external frameworks. However there is some degree of correspondence between them. However, all cultures in the world that have homo sapien offspring have corresponding patterns in matters of inside frameworks vs outside frameworks. All cultures have Universal patterns. All peoples on earth are homo sapiens from the seas and soils of Mother Earth.
The modes of production of any vaccine or virus, have infrastructure, structure and superstructure. There are Production, reproduction, domestic and political economy, the creative, the expressive, aesthetic, and the intellectual aspects of human life and cells. The definition of research is essential in organized research strategy and one adapts. The aim of my research is to emphasize the influence of material conditions, the causes of the differences to thought, behaviour, that characterize specific human populations. Enculterated patterns are encoded in the brain and not in the genes of the units of biological hereditary. The theories of Scientific creationists are examined and their attacks against evolutionism in biology and anthropology are refuted.
Natural selection takes place as a result of the infinite reproductive powers of life. Natural selection acts upon the units of hereditary instruction, or genes, located in the reproductive cells of each organism. It does so by increasing or decreasing the frequency of genetic variants. The main source of genetic variations are mutations of genes. Genes that select for health are said to be “selected for.” Genes that lead to lower fitness are said to be “selected against.” Social Darwinists, struggle for survival as the mainspring of both biological and cultural evolution. Although within species killing sometimes does occur and plays a role in biological evolution, the factors promoting differential reproductive successes are in the main not related to an organism’s capability of destruction of other members of his own population. Neo-Darwiniam is a modern theory of Darwin’s theory of natural selection incorporating the findings of genetics. There are debates over the Neo Scientific community…..Neo-Darwiniam is the term properly used even today for the synthesis between Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection and the assumption that the variations on which selection acts are produced solely or primarily by “gene mutations” though the term Modern Synthesis is more correct since Romane coined the clarification of the relationship between neo-Darwiniam, modern synthesis, and the selfish gene idea. Neo Darwiniam is a term introduced by physiologist George Romane in 1883. and it’s development Pigliucci & Muller, 2010. for the relevant history into the modern synthesis Huxley 1942, as a gene centred view of evolution can of course be stated without reference to the selfish gene idea. Neo Darwinian is popularly used even today for the synthesis between Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection and the assumption that the variations on which selection acts are produced solely or primarily by gene mutations, though the term modern synthesis is more correct since Romane coined the term Neo – Darwiniam theory before Mendel’s work on genetics was rediscovered. Instead of continuous variations, mutations are believed to help form new species. Neo Darwinian theory explains the arrival of the fittest. ( I am going to suggest it would have to be attached to the birth of an immune system that would supply more immunity through cells to fight selection for health not selection for less health. It claims that selection is positive selection of genes with mutations playing only a subsidiary role. Because of this character it’s been called the neo-Darwinian theory. Complex life evolved from simple cells called prokaryotic cells being injected by the eukaryotic cells to cause virulence. They started evolution by doubling in cells. Is neo Darwinian theory supported? Darwin collected a huge amount of data and it fits beautifully into his theory of evolution through natural selection. Evolution may be just a theory, but it is probably the most well supported theory and most widely accepted theory that science has ever seen. Although Darwin did not understand each offspring is a unique hybrid of variations, which provides the raw material on which natural selection operates, He did not know about genes and he speculated wrongly but reasonably , that acquired characteristics might be passed on to offspring as Lamarack had proposed. Jesus was his own separate creation for he was Mary’s miracle and was a unique hybrid. God is love, in 1 John. Agape, Amour and Eros. But Jesus’s genes are his own unique hybrid genome. As mine are. I am a unique biological organism that adapts and survives from data intake from my environment, into my senses, from Etic outer frameworks to Emic inner workings.
This is written by Carolyn d Hogarth Canada
